AI Governance Policy Pack
Adopting AI without rules is how small businesses get burned. Answer five questions and AI generates a complete governance pack personalised to your business — an AI Use Policy, staff acceptable-use guidelines, a realistic AI risk register and a customer-facing transparency statement — aligned to Australia’s Guidance for AI Adoption (AI6) and written in plain English. Not legal advice; a ready-to-adopt starting point.
The AI Governance Policy Pack is the written layer a business is meant to have before it starts using AI, sold to the many that did it the other way round. A$99 one-off buys four personalised documents — an AI Use Policy, staff acceptable-use guidelines, an AI risk register and a customer-facing transparency statement — drafted around your business rather than pulled off a template shelf, and back with you in around 15 minutes.
What prompts the purchase is usually external. A client asks whether their material is going into a chatbot. An insurer's renewal form has a new question on it. A tender wants a policy attached. Or someone pastes a confidential file into a public model and it dawns on you that nobody ever said not to.
From the policy you sign to the page your team will actually read
The AI Use Policy is the governing document: two to three pages, the one you sign, date and keep on file. The Staff Acceptable-Use Guidelines compress it into a single page for people who will never open a policy — what may go into an AI tool, what must not, and who to ask when it is unclear. The AI Risk Register lists eight to ten realistic risks with a mitigation against each, which is what turns the set from principles into actions. The Customer AI Transparency Statement is the outward-facing piece, plain English, ready to put in front of clients. An AI6 implementation checklist sits alongside them.
A trades business and a clinic do not get the same risk register
One intake question is deliberately open-ended: how your business uses AI today. A three-person trades outfit drafting quotes carries different exposure to an allied-health clinic running a booking chatbot, and the register is drafted from what you describe rather than reciting generic AI harms. Team size feeds the staff guidelines, so they are pitched at the team you have rather than a fifty-person compliance function. Naming real tools and real tasks produces sharper documents; "a bit of ChatGPT" produces documents to match.
AI6 alignment is a governance position, not a certification
Australia's Guidance for AI Adoption (AI6) is voluntary guidance, not legislation. Mapping your documents to its essential practices gives you a documented, defensible position where you previously had none — it does not certify you as compliant with anything. The pack is also AI-drafted rather than lawyer-drafted: no compliance audit, no legal advice, and nothing in it inspects your systems, connects to your AI tools or checks what staff are doing. It works from your intake answers alone. Have a qualified professional review it before you rely on it, particularly under sector obligations in health, finance, education or government contracting.
Markdown out, and the part only you can do
Everything lands on your order page and downloads as Markdown, which prints to PDF and pastes cleanly into Word or Google Docs. There is no .docx export, so branded letterhead means dropping the text into your own template. Three free AI revisions are included — soften a corporate tone, add a tool you forgot, tighten a risk entry, re-pitch the staff guidelines. The final step is not something a document can do for you: sign it, date it, circulate the one-pager and get the team to acknowledge it. An unsigned policy sitting in a downloads folder governs nothing.
What you get
- AI Use Policy (2–3 pages, personalised)
- Staff Acceptable-Use Guidelines (1 page)
- AI Risk Register — 8–10 realistic risks with mitigations
- Customer AI Transparency Statement
- AI6 implementation checklist
- 3 free AI revisions included
Turnaround: ~15 minutes. Delivery: On-page + Markdown download (print to PDF).
Frequently asked questions
We already wrote something ourselves in a Google Doc. What does this add?
Mostly structure and coverage. A self-written note tends to be one page of good intentions; this is four linked documents plus an AI6 implementation checklist, with the risk register forcing eight to ten specific exposures and a mitigation against each. Whether that beats what you have depends on what you wrote. If your existing document already names your tools, sets staff rules and has a customer-facing position, you may not need this.
Nothing we do is customer-facing. Does the transparency statement just get binned?
You still receive all four documents and the checklist, and what you say about customer interaction shapes the drafting. Even without a chatbot or automated contact, having a written position on file is worth something the day a client, an insurer or a tender asks how you use AI — a drafted answer beats improvising one.
The three revisions — what can I actually change with them?
They are AI redrafts, not a human legal review. Tone, a tool you forgot to mention, a risk entry that misses the mark, staff guidelines pitched at the wrong audience: all fair game. Three is what is included at this price, so read all four documents before sending anything back and bundle your changes rather than spending a revision on one line.